UK baby killer Lucy Letby found guilty of trying to kill another child

Last month, she went on trial for a second time on one count of attempted murder of a further baby girl, known as Child K, a charge on which the original jury had failed to reach a verdict.

Prosecutor Nick Johnson told Manchester Crown Court that Child K was born prematurely at 25 weeks in February 2016 at the hospital, and had been connected to a ventilator and other machines monitoring her heart rate and oxygen levels.

Little more than an hour after the birth, while other staff were absent, Johnson said, senior doctor Ravi Jayaram entered the room where she was being looked after to find the baby’s breathing tube dislodged, alarms that should have sounded had become disabled, and Letby standing there “doing nothing”.

Johnson added that on two further occasions that night, Letby interfered with the breathing tube to give the impression there was a particular problem with the baby.

“These were the actions of a cold-blooded, calculated killer,” Senior Crown Prosecutor Nicola Wyn Williams said in a statement on Tuesday following the verdict.

Child K died in a different hospital three days later, although the prosecution said this had nothing to do with the allegation against Letby.

In her evidence, Letby again denied having ever harmed any baby put in her care, and said she had no recollection of the night in question. Her defence lawyer said the evidence was not there to prove her guilt.

Letby was originally found guilty of killing the five baby boys and two baby girls by injecting the infants with insulin or air, or force-feeding them milk.

The case shocked Britain and prompted the government to order an inquiry into why concerns about her behaviour had not been heeded by hospital bosses.

Police also said they were carrying out further investigations into whether there were other victims at hospitals where Letby had previously worked.

For some on social media, Letby has become a cause célèbre who was herself a victim of a terrible miscarriage of justice and, ahead of the latest trial, the New Yorker magazine ran an article questioning the evidence against her.

In May, however, England’s Court of Appeal rejected her attempt to overturn her conviction, which had been mainly based on arguments that evidence from the prosecution’s expert witness was flawed.

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7tK%2FMqWWcp51ku6bD0miuqKqcmXymwdGop55nkafBqq%2FLnmZsamZthnOCjq6iZpqRl8Zut8ilo56qXaHCpMWMpZytmqlis7DBzZ1koK2ZocG6edOrsKKml2K4qrjLZpinp6SdsrN5wqGgpZw%3D